Lots of this was going on before there was any kind of Jewish Zionism, but it did make British and American politicians in particular receptive to the Zionist movement when it emerged. The same romantic notions of Jews meant that the same politicians who were proto-Zionists didn't like actual Jews very much; they failed to live up to the image of ancient Israelites, and they wanted emancipation and equal rights rather than national restoration.
Where I think the book falls down is that its picture of Jewish Zionism, when it emerges, is utterly divorced from the context in which Zionism grew among Jews. There's no account of the upsurge of antisemitism in the Russian Empire, and then in its Polish successor state. The word "pogrom" does not appear in the index, and there's no reference to the May Laws of 1882. The Nazis mainly appear in terms of the Ha'avara agreement with German Zionists, and this is - as is so often the case - represented as if it were a convergence of equals. We learn that the British initially promoted and encouraged Jewish immigration to Palestine, and that they later put up quotas to stop too many Jews arriving; but although the book talks about other western countries refusing to take Jewish refugees, there's not much recognition that the Jews who were trying to migrate to Palestine were desperate refugees too, not pith-helmeted colonists.
I note in passing that there's nothing about the Communist honeymoon with Zionism either, though there is a discussion about the influence of Zionists (again via Christians) on the American labour movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment